Skip to main content
Chapters 38 total chapters

NEET UG · Biology

Principle of inheritance and variation

Revise the concepts. Try a question. Understand your next step.

176 medium questions available · Try answers free. Sign in to save progress or take a quiz.

NEET UG · Biology

Continue studying Principle Of Inheritance And Variation

Understand the concept, practise questions and check your learning.

Understand

Separate genotype and phenotype, solve conditional probabilities and count recombinant test-cross offspring from a stated parental phase. Inheritance: choose the probability model before using a ratio

About 5 min · NEET UG

Read the guide

Practise

Try 176 medium chapter MCQs. Untimed; check answers and available explanations as you go.

Free answers · Sign in to save progress

Practise chapter MCQs

Check your learning

Prepare a timed chapter quiz. Choose the available question count and pace before starting.

Sign-in required · Explanations after submission

Prepare a chapter quiz

This is chapter practice, not a full-length NEET mock paper.

Choose your practice

All Biology chapters →

These are playable question counts after quality and duplicate checks.

How practice and quizzes work

The practice player uses single-correct-answer MCQs. Chapter quizzes are not full-length NEET mock papers. Check the practice guide and official syllabus sources.

Revise before you practise

Study resources 63

Open full resource hub →

Inheritance: choose the probability model before using a ratio

Separate genotype and phenotype, solve conditional probabilities and count recombinant test-cross offspring from a stated parental phase.

What you will understand

For NEET UG Biology students: build a probability from gametes, distinguish genotype from phenotype and use test-cross phase before counting recombinant classes.

Jump to chapter practice →

Quick answer: ratios depend on the question and its assumptions

A cross describes gamete combinations; dominance determines how genotypes map to phenotype in a particular model. For Aa×Aa with equally likely gametes and random fertilisation, genotype probabilities are one-quarter AA, one-half Aa and one-quarter aa. A three-to-one phenotype ratio additionally assumes complete dominance and comparable survival and expression. Dominant does not mean more common, stronger or inherently advantageous.

Read the genotype square before grouping its cells

A Punnett square for Aa crossed with Aa has two equally likely gametes A and a from each parent. Four equal-sized cells show AA, Aa, Aa and aa, each with probability one quarter. Genotype probabilities are one quarter AA, one half Aa and one quarter aa. Grouping AA and Aa gives a three-to-one phenotype ratio only under complete dominance and the other stated model assumptions. The square shows probability, not a guarantee of one particular set of four offspring. Labels accompany the colour distinction.
The four equal boxes show AA, Aa, Aa and aa from two equally likely gametes per parent. Each box has probability one-quarter. Combining the two heterozygote boxes gives one-half Aa. Combining AA and Aa gives the dominant phenotype only under the stated complete-dominance model. A four-box square does not guarantee one of each outcome among four actual offspring.

Open full-size diagram ↗

Condition on the phenotype actually observed

In the stated complete-dominance Aa×Aa model, choose an offspring known to show the dominant phenotype. The eligible outcomes are AA, Aa and Aa. Therefore

P(Aa∣dominant)=23,P(\mathrm{Aa}\mid\mathrm{dominant})=\frac{2}{3},
not one-half. The denominator changed because aa was excluded. This is a conditional probability for the model, not an inference that a visible dominant trait always proves one genotype.

Independent assortment is an extra two-locus assumption

For a suitable AaBb parent with independently assorting loci, AB, Ab, aB and ab gametes each have probability one-quarter. Linked loci can deviate from that model. Before multiplying one-locus probabilities, check whether the problem supplies independence, linkage information or observed gamete frequencies. Complete dominance and independent assortment are different assumptions.

Use phase and the tester to read original offspring counts

An AB/ab heterozygous parent is test-crossed with ab/ab. Original illustrative offspring counts are eighty AaBb, eighty aabb, twenty Aabb and twenty aaBb. Bar widths use five pixels per offspring, so the parental classes are longer than the recombinant classes. The recombinant fraction is forty out of two hundred, or twenty percent. The interpretation assumes the stated phase, a suitable tester and comparable recovery and viability of classes. It is not a direct physical DNA distance, a claim of guaranteed ratios in every cross or a measure of all crossovers.
The illustrated parent is AB/ab and the tester ab/ab. The original counts are 80 AaBb, 80 aabb, 20 Aabb and 20 aaBb. The first two retain the parent’s AB or ab combination; the others are recombinant. Bars share a scale of five pixels per offspring. Interpretation assumes comparable recovery and viability; it is not a direct measurement of DNA distance.

Open full-size diagram ↗

Calculate the recombinant fraction from both classes

In the illustrated data, both recombinant classes must be included: 20 + 20 = 40 out of 200 offspring. The observed recombinant fraction is 0.20, or 20%. Counting only one small class gives 10% and misses half the recombinant observations. The value is not a count of all crossover events, and a two-point percentage should not be reported as an exact base-pair distance.

Segregation does not blend two alleles into one

A diploid heterozygote carries two allele versions at a locus; ordinary gametes receive one allele at that locus. The recessive version is not erased simply because a dominant phenotype is expressed. A population can contain more than two alleles at a locus even though a standard diploid individual carries at most two copies there. Keep the individual and population levels distinct.

Use independence without promising exact family-sized ratios

In an original Aa×Aa model, each independently produced offspring has probability one-quarter of aa. For two specified offspring, both being aa has probability one-sixteenth. It is not one-half merely because two outcomes were requested. The multiplication uses the stated independent events; it does not mean that earlier outcomes force later offspring to balance a ratio.

A test cross asks a different question from a self cross

Crossing a dominant-phenotype individual with an appropriate homozygous recessive tester can reveal information about its gametes. A self cross combines two gamete draws from the same genotype and has a different expected distribution. Match the actual parental genotypes before recalling a ratio. The same visible phenotype can be produced by different genotypes in a complete-dominance model.

Common mistakes: change the denominator or assume unprovided independence

List the eligible outcomes and state whether a condition has removed any. For two loci, check phase and independence. For recombinant counts, include both relevant classes. Keep an expected probability separate from an observed small-sample ratio, and do not use a dominant phenotype alone as proof of homozygosity.

Try it: use a two-locus tester model

Under independent assortment, AaBb is crossed with aabb. What is the probability of aabb and what is the probability of AaBb?

Reveal the answer

The heterozygous parent makes AB, Ab, aB and ab equally. The tester contributes ab. Each requested genotype therefore has probability one-quarter. The familiar nine-to-three-to-three-to-one phenotype ratio belongs to a different two-heterozygote cross with additional dominance assumptions.

Try it: interpret an expected count

A stated Aa×Aa model predicts 25% aa. Must a sample of twenty offspring contain exactly five aa?

Reveal the answer

No. Five is the expected count, obtained from twenty times one-quarter. Actual random samples can differ. The model gives a probability distribution; it does not allocate one recessive outcome after every three dominant ones.

Come back tomorrow: write the denominator first

Rebuild the four outcomes and then condition on the dominant phenotype. Identify the two recombinant classes in a phase-labelled test cross. Connect allele counting to Evolution, or distinguish inheritance of a construct from its verification in Biotechnology Principles and Processes.

Practice opens the broad inheritance pool, not a guaranteed linkage-only set.

Sources and review

Technical review: Codex (automated), 24 October 2026. Core mechanisms were compared with the linked primary textbooks and university or government references. All diagrams, problem inputs and explanations are original. Numerical balances and diagram directions are checked separately. Independent human subject review is not claimed. These focused guides support the existing chapter catalogue; they do not claim complete current exam or syllabus coverage.

Choose your next chapter task

Choose a conditional-probability or linkage question after writing its eligible outcomes, parental phase and assumptions. Use the explanation to identify the step that changed your denominator.

Open chapter practice and quiz choices →

Sources and reading
Type at least 2 characters or jump directly:
🔓

Save your learning progress

Sign in with a free account to save your practice answers and quiz results, then return to them when you revise.