What you will take away
- Round 2 recorded 13,572 MBBS allotments; Round 3 recorded 8,334. Students can appear in more than one round.
- The share marked Upgraded was 16.91% in Round 2 and 42.40% in Round 3, among each round’s MBBS allottees.
- Explore the allotted option positions and selected college rank endpoints without mixing quotas or categories.
- A dated additions matrix and a separately matched joined list explain two further stages of the admissions story.
Start here if: You want to understand what later counselling rounds changed, or practise reading an admission table before making your own shortlist.
Jump to a section
One counselling cycle. Several kinds of numbers.
For a student waiting for an allotment, Round 1 is a beginning. Some receive a seat, some seek an upgrade, and others enter the process later. The useful question is: what did the next round actually change?
The archived MCC 2025 final-result files record 22,149 MBBS allotments in Round 1, 13,572 in Round 2 and 8,334 in Round 3. A student can appear in more than one round. These figures count current-round decisions across MCC quotas and allotted categories; they do not count all Indian medical admissions.
A small difference between source versions
The archived Round 1 final result contains 22,149 MBBS allotments. Later result histories include three additional Round 1 MBBS records. The chart preserves each dated result version; it does not force the histories into the original total. The difference is retained rather than silently changing the original result.
Three rounds. Three sets of MBBS allotment decisions.
MCC UG 2025 · all MCC quotas and allotted categories · current-round MBBS rows only
- Round 122,149MBBS allotments
- Round 213,572MBBS allotments
- Round 38,334MBBS allotments
These are overlapping round decisions, not three groups of unique students or a count of filled seats. Do not add the bars. The source-version note above explains three later Round 1 history records.
View the exact data
| Result | MBBS rows | All-course allotments | Rows in result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 22,149 | 26,608 | 26,608 |
| Round 2 | 13,572 | 15,321 | 35,551 |
| Round 3 | 8,334 | 9,143 | 39,479 |
Round 3 had a different mix of allotments.
In Round 2, 11,277 MBBS allotments were marked Fresh and 2,295 were marked Upgraded. In Round 3, the corresponding counts were 4,800 and 3,534. The upgrade share among that round’s MBBS allottees rose from 16.91% to 42.40%.
That is a change in the mix of decisions, not proof that upgrading became easier for any particular applicant. Change the round below and compare both counts. Candidates retaining an earlier seat without a new allotment are outside this figure.
Fresh allotments and upgrades tell different stories
Only current-round MBBS allottees · “Fresh” and “Upgraded” follow MCC result remarks
Round 2: 13,572 MBBS allotments; 16.91% marked Upgraded.
An upgrade share is not an applicant’s chance of upgrading. Retained seats and candidates without a new allotment are outside this chart. An upgrade can also change course, category or quota.
View the exact data
| Round | Fresh allotted | Marked Upgraded | MBBS denominator | Upgrade share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | 11,277 | 2,295 | 13,572 | 16.91% |
| Round 3 | 4,800 | 3,534 | 8,334 | 42.40% |
An earlier seat can remain without another allotment.
The next result also tells us what happened to the preceding round’s MBBS cohort. In the Round 2 history, 12,257 earlier MBBS rows were Reported and 9,659 were Not Reported; 231 were Seat Surrendered and five Seat Cancelled.
Among those reported earlier MBBS rows, 10,020 had no new Round 2 allotment. Their remarks distinguish not opting for an upgrade, not filling fresh choices and No Upgradation. That is why a new-allotment count alone cannot describe everyone still holding an earlier seat. Change the cohort below to inspect the Round 2 status recorded in the Round 3 result.
An earlier seat can remain without a new allotment
Reporting status of immediately preceding-round MBBS allotments, as recorded in the next result
Round 1 MBBS cohort in Round 2 history: 22,152 records.
10,020 reported earlier MBBS rows had no new allotment in the current round.
These are result-history statuses, not final joined counts or reasons for non-reporting. The Round 1 history has three more MBBS records than the original Round 1 result; that version difference is retained. The no-new-allotment subset overlaps the Reported bar.
View the exact data
| Previous cohort / result | Reported | Not Reported | Surrendered | Cancelled | Cohort total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 in Round 2 | 12,257 | 9,659 | 231 | 5 | 22,152 |
| Round 2 in Round 3 | 10,390 | 2,968 | 212 | 2 | 13,572 |
View the exact data
| Previous cohort / result | Did not opt for upgrade | Did not fill fresh choices | No Upgradation | Subset total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 in Round 2 | 6,229 | 536 | 3,255 | 10,020 |
| Round 2 in Round 3 | 4,622 | 392 | 2,305 | 7,319 |
Your second choice is not your second round.
The results also include an option number: the position of the option allotted from the submitted choices for that round. Round 2 recorded 1,278 MBBS allottees at option 1, 796 at option 2 and 685 at option 3. The remaining records were at later positions.
This lets us tell a more precise story about the options received. It does not reveal the full preference lists of unsuccessful applicants. MCC required fresh choices for later rounds, so a student’s option 2 in one round need not refer to the same college in another. See the 2025 choice-filling rules.
Round 2 is not the same as choice number 2
Allotted “option No.” field · MBBS allottees receiving a current-round allotment
Round 2: 13,572 MBBS allottees with a recorded option number; none missing.
The option number is the allotted position in that round’s submitted choices. Fresh choices in later rounds mean the lists can differ. These records do not identify every applicant’s first, second or third preferred college.
View the exact data
| Round | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | Options 4–10 | Option 11+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | 1,278 | 796 | 685 | 2,489 | 8,324 |
| Round 3 | 972 | 476 | 340 | 1,377 | 5,169 |
A rank comparison needs the same seat pool.
Take AIIMS Bhubaneswar, MBBS, Open Seat Quota, allotted category Open. Among the new allotment rows in each result, the highest AIR was 706 in Round 1, 765 in Round 2 and 785 in Round 3. Holding the course, quota and allotted category constant makes that comparison meaningful.
The explorer also includes examples with no new Open allotment in a later round. Those cells remain blank rather than becoming rank zero. These are endpoints of new allotments in the result file, not a reconstruction of every seat retained after the round. Select a different college and read its quota before comparing.
Read a rank endpoint inside one seat pool
Selected examples · MBBS · allotted category Open · AIR among current-round allotment rows
AIIMS, Bhubaneswar · Open Seat Quota · MBBS · allotted category Open. Highest AIR among new allotment rows in each result.
This is not a reconstructed cutoff for every seat held after a round. Retained seats are excluded. A larger AIR number is a lower position in the rank order; it is not a better score. A blank later round does not mean the college closed or had no students.
View the exact data
| College / quota | Round | Highest AIR | New rows | PDF page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIIMS, Bhubaneswar · Open Seat Quota | Round 1 | 706 | 49 | 27 |
| AIIMS, Bhubaneswar · Open Seat Quota | Round 2 | 765 | 9 | 47 |
| AIIMS, Bhubaneswar · Open Seat Quota | Round 3 | 785 | 1 | 31 |
| AIIMS, Patna · Open Seat Quota | Round 1 | 1,537 | 50 | 55 |
| AIIMS, Patna · Open Seat Quota | Round 2 | 1,907 | 14 | 108 |
| AIIMS, Patna · Open Seat Quota | Round 3 | 1,939 | 3 | 69 |
| AIIMS, Jodhpur · Open Seat Quota | Round 1 | 392 | 57 | 16 |
| AIIMS, Jodhpur · Open Seat Quota | Round 2 | 386 | 2 | 24 |
| AIIMS, Jodhpur · Open Seat Quota | Round 3 | No new allotment row | 0 | — |
| AIIMS, New Delhi · Open Seat Quota | Round 1 | 48 | 48 | 4 |
| AIIMS, New Delhi · Open Seat Quota | Round 2 | No new allotment row | 0 | — |
| AIIMS, New Delhi · Open Seat Quota | Round 3 | No new allotment row | 0 | — |
| SETH G.S. MEDICAL COLLEGE, MUMBAI · All India | Round 1 | 868 | 15 | 32 |
| SETH G.S. MEDICAL COLLEGE, MUMBAI · All India | Round 2 | 1,126 | 3 | 66 |
| SETH G.S. MEDICAL COLLEGE, MUMBAI · All India | Round 3 | No new allotment row | 0 | — |
Where did students receiving upgrades go?
We can count the institutions receiving recorded upgrades to MBBS. For example, JLN Medical College, Belagavi received 88 such allotments in Round 2. The charts show the five largest destination counts in each round, with all other destinations kept in the total.
These counts are useful evidence of movement. They are not a vote for the “best” college: capacity, quota eligibility and the choices available to each candidate all affect what can be allotted. Upgrades can also cross courses. Of Round 2’s upgrades to MBBS, 57 came from BDS and one from B.Sc. Nursing; Round 3 included 51 from BDS.
Where did recorded upgrades to MBBS land?
Five largest destination counts in each round · all MCC quotas and categories · observed upgrades, not preference votes
Round 2 · 2,295 upgrades to MBBS
All other destinations: 1,988 upgrades. 58 upgrades came from a different course.
Round 3 · 3,534 upgrades to MBBS
All other destinations: 3,325 upgrades. 51 upgrades came from a different course.
Counts reflect seats, available choices and eligibility together. They do not establish the most preferred or best college, students’ motives, fees paid or final joining. Different campuses stay separate.
View the exact data
| Round / destination | Upgrades |
|---|---|
| Round 2 · JLN Medical College, Belagavi | 88 |
| Round 2 · MGM Medical College, Aurangabad | 64 |
| Round 2 · B.L.D.E University, Bijapur | 62 |
| Round 2 · SDU Medical College, Kolar | 47 |
| Round 2 · JSS Medical College, Mysuru | 46 |
| Round 2 · All other destinations | 1,988 |
| Round 3 · JLN Medical College, Belagavi | 49 |
| Round 3 · MGM Medical College, Panvel | 49 |
| Round 3 · Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur | 40 |
| Round 3 · JGMM Medical College, Hubballi | 36 |
| Round 3 · IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar | 35 |
| Round 3 · All other destinations | 3,325 |
View the exact data
| Round / previous institution | MBBS destination | Previous course | Upgrades |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 · Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Univ., Mangalore | Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Univ., Manipal | MBBS | 25 |
| Round 2 · Dr. DYP Edu. Soc. Deemed Uni., Kolhapur | MGM Medical College, Aurangabad | MBBS | 23 |
| Round 2 · AIIMS, Rai Bareli | AIIMS, Gorakhpur | MBBS | 18 |
| Round 2 · Sri Siddhartha Academy T Begur | Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur | MBBS | 18 |
| Round 2 · JGMM Medical College, Hubballi | JLN Medical College, Belagavi | MBBS | 17 |
| Round 3 · Sri Siddhartha Academy T Begur | Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur | MBBS | 26 |
| Round 3 · Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai | ACS Medical College, Chennai | MBBS | 14 |
| Round 3 · JGMM Medical College, Hubballi | JLN Medical College, Belagavi | MBBS | 11 |
| Round 3 · JGMM Medical College, Hubballi | B.L.D.E University, Bijapur | MBBS | 11 |
| Round 3 · Sri Lakshmi Narayana Inst. of Med. Scien., Puducherry | Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Pondicherry,SBV Pondicherry Campus, Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry, 607402 | MBBS | 11 |
The seat pool can change between rounds.
A separate MCC matrix dated 5 September 2025 listed 1,134 newly added seats: 1,126 MBBS and 8 BDS. Within its MBBS rows, Maharashtra accounted for 358, Karnataka for 159 and Tamil Nadu for 150.
This is the location of the institutions receiving seats, not the home state of students who received them. It is also one dated matrix. Later additions, withdrawals or revisions require their own records; this is not the complete national capacity increase for 2025.
One Round 2 matrix added 1,126 MBBS seats
MCC newly-added-seat snapshot · 5 September 2025 · institution location, not candidate domicile
1,126 MBBS + 8 BDS = 1,134 seats in this matrix
This is one dated additions matrix, not the cycle’s complete net capacity change. It cannot be added blindly to clear or virtual vacancies. The chart does not prove these additions caused a rank change.
View the exact data
| Institution state | Added MBBS seats |
|---|---|
| Maharashtra | 358 |
| Karnataka | 159 |
| Tamil Nadu | 150 |
| Odisha | 80 |
| Bihar | 50 |
| Jharkhand | 50 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 40 |
| Rajasthan | 39 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 33 |
| Haryana | 30 |
| Jammu And Kashmir | 29 |
| Assam | 28 |
| Punjab | 15 |
| Kerala | 14 |
| West Bengal | 12 |
| Telangana | 11 |
| Delhi (NCT) | 8 |
| Gujarat | 8 |
| Meghalaya | 8 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 4 |
An allotment and a joined entry are different milestones.
The official joined-candidate list up to Round 3 contains 28,438 entries across its listed courses. Matching each AIR and admitted round to the final Round 3 history identifies 24,259 MBBS entries: 9,413 recorded under admitted round 1, 7,319 under round 2 and 7,527 under round 3.
The joined list does not contain a separate course column, so the MBBS count is a TopAll calculation from that exact match; every entry matched. A candidate who upgraded can be recorded under a later admitted round. These bars therefore cannot be divided by the earlier allotment bars to calculate an initial reporting rate. The list excludes later stray rounds and does not cover separate state counselling.
The joined list answers a different question
MBBS entries in the official up-to-Round-3 joined list · course linked to the admitted-round history
24,259 linked MBBS entries · 28,438 entries across all listed courses
All 28,438 joined-list AIRs matched the final Round 3 history. MBBS is resolved from each record’s admitted round. An upgraded candidate can be recorded under a later round; these are not initial reporting rates. Later stray rounds and state counselling are excluded.
View the exact data
| Admitted round | Linked MBBS entries | All-course entries |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 9,413 | 12,064 |
| Round 2 | 7,319 | 8,357 |
| Round 3 | 7,527 | 8,017 |
Try it: what can Mira conclude?
Fictional data-reading example. Mira is looking at the 2025 AIIMS Patna rows for MBBS, Open Seat Quota and allotted category Open. She sees highest newly allotted AIRs of 1,537, 1,907 and 1,939. She says, “Someone at AIR 1,800 could see a later-round allotment in this seat pool, so I would definitely get one.” Which part goes too far?
Reveal the reasoning
The records show that later rounds included new allotments at larger AIR numbers than Round 1. They do not guarantee a seat for Mira. Her own choices, eligibility, documents and participation still matter, and a later year can have a different pool. A rank endpoint describes an observed result; it is not an individual admission probability.
She should also check allotted category, not assume it is identical to a candidate’s personal category. A candidate from a reserved category can receive an Open seat.
Turn the story into a useful comparison.
Write down five labels before comparing two numbers: year, course, college, quota and allotted category. Add the round and rank type. Then ask whether the number describes a new allotment, an earlier seat still held, or an entry in a joined list.
Use the records to understand a past process. For your own counselling year, read its current official rules and notices. Open MCC’s undergraduate counselling page.
For the examination before admissions, read NEET 2026 in numbers or return to the NEET study library.
Quick check: choose the correct denominator.
A friend divides the 2,295 Round 2 MBBS upgrades by all NEET test takers and calls the result the upgrade rate. Does that describe this chart?
Check your answer
No. For the share of current-round MBBS allotments marked Upgraded, use 2,295 ÷ 13,572 × 100 = 16.91%. It describes that round’s MBBS allottees. It does not estimate the probability of upgrading for all applicants or all test takers.
Your next data check
Try a three-minute comparison
Use the rank explorer to practise one careful comparison. Write your conclusion before checking the source.
- Choose a college in the rank explorer and write down its quota, course and allotted category.
- Compare only the same pool across the three rounds. Treat “No new allotment row” as missing, not zero.
- Explain one observed change in a sentence, then name one thing the figures cannot tell you.
Sources and method
TopAll extracted the complete dated MCC final-result PDFs into round-specific columns and aggregated MBBS current-round rows. Fresh and Upgraded follow the official remarks, including annotated variants. All option numbers in those MBBS allotments are present and positive. Selected rank endpoints filter exact course, quota and allotted category and do not reconstruct retained-seat cutoffs. Joined-list AIR and admitted round were matched one-to-one to the final Round 3 history to identify course; all 28,438 records matched, with 24,259 MBBS entries. The additions matrix reconciles to its printed total of 1,134. Later histories contain three Round 1 MBBS records absent from the original Round 1 file; dated result totals are preserved separately. Percentages are TopAll calculations rounded to two decimals. Student identities and complete individual choice lists are not displayed. Reporting charts classify the immediately preceding-round MBBS history into its four official reporting states. The reported/no-new-allotment subset is shown separately and overlaps Reported. Upgrade origin/destination pairs use the most recent available prior allotment within the same result history; they are descriptive movement records, not preference votes.
- MCC final Round 1 allotment result
2025 · PDF pages 3–1107; dated result file 13 August 2025 · Checked 2026-10-20
- MCC final Round 2 allotment result
2025 · PDF pages 3–3237; result reaffirmed by superseding 18 September clarification · Checked 2026-10-20
- MCC final Round 3 allotment result
2025 · PDF pages 2–1930; revised result dated 23 October 2025 · Checked 2026-10-20
- MCC admitted / joined candidates up to Round 3
2025 · PDF pages 1–1469; admitted round used for course-history linkage · Checked 2026-10-20
- MCC newly added seats for Round 2
2025 · PDF pages 1–9; 5 September 2025 matrix; printed grand total 1,134 · Checked 2026-10-20
- MCC UG counselling information bulletin 2025
2025 · PDF pages 38–42; choice order, fresh choices and upgrades · Checked 2026-10-20
- MCC superseding clarification on Round 2 result
2025 · Single page: result remains unchanged as declared 18 September 2025, 11:40 AM · Checked 2026-10-20
Frequently asked questions
Start with your question. Open an answer, then choose one study task to try.
Does Round 2 mean a student received their second choice?
No. Round number identifies a counselling stage. The allotted option number identifies a position in that round’s submitted choice list. They answer different questions.
Can we identify everyone’s first, second and third preferred colleges?
No. The result records the option that was allotted, not the full ranked lists of all applicants. The charts show allotted positions among current-round MBBS allottees only.
What changed between Round 2 and Round 3 in these results?
Round 2 recorded 11,277 fresh MBBS allotments and 2,295 upgrades to MBBS. Round 3 recorded 4,800 fresh allotments and 3,534 upgrades. Retained earlier seats without a new allotment are outside those totals.
Can I add all three rounds to count admitted students?
No. The same person can receive more than one allotment across rounds. Allotments, unique people, seats held and confirmed joining need different calculations.
Are the rank charts official final college cutoffs?
They are TopAll calculations of the highest AIR among new allotment rows in each selected seat pool and result. They do not reconstruct every retained seat. Each exact-data row identifies its source PDF page.
Does “No new allotment row” mean rank zero or no seats?
Neither. It means no current-round row matched the selected college, MBBS, quota and allotted category in that result. Earlier retained seats can still exist.
Are the largest upgrade destinations the most popular colleges?
The counts show where recorded upgrades to MBBS landed. Capacity, eligibility and available choices also affect the result, so these counts do not establish a preference ranking, quality ranking or student motivation.
Does an upgrade always mean a different college?
No. A result marked Upgraded can involve a course, quota or allotted-category change as well as a college change. The destination charts retain the official upgrade classification.
Why does the joined list give a different number?
The joined list records a different stage. Up to Round 3 it contains 28,438 entries across listed courses. Matching admitted-round course histories identifies 24,259 MBBS entries; it does not establish final national admissions.
Why not calculate a joining percentage for each round?
A candidate who upgrades can appear under a later admitted round in the joined list. Dividing those entries by an earlier round’s allotments would mix different populations and would not measure initial reporting.
What does the added-seat chart include?
It includes the 1,126 MBBS seats in MCC’s newly-added-seat matrix dated 5 September 2025. The same matrix also contains eight BDS seats. It is not the cycle’s complete net capacity change.
Can I use the 2025 outcome to predict my admission?
Use it as historical context, not a guarantee. Check the current year’s official counselling rules and match the course, rank type, quota and allotted category before comparing records.